Assurance of Student Learning Outcomes
[Note: If you would like someone to do a training session for your program, department,
or college, please email for scheduling.]
What are student learning outcomes?
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) are the specific skills and/or knowledge graduates of your program (majors and certificates)
are expected to master. Many programs developed good SLOs, but some are still struggling with this concept.
The University of Wisconsin has a helpful breakdown of the concept and how to write effective SLOs. Similarly,
Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs) are the skills, competencies, and “big ideas” students
should be able to articulate, put into action, or utilize (theoretically or pragmatically)
after the completion of a major or certificate program. As the site notes, learning
outcomes should be clear, observable, measurable, and reflect the skills and knowledge
covered in the program.
Ask yourself the following questions when developing learning outcomes:
- What do we want students in our program to know?
- What do we want students to be able to do?
- When do we want them to be able to do it?
- Are the outcomes observable, measurable, and reasonable (can they be performed by students)?
Note: While “graduate school attainment” and “employment” are clearly important results
of the overall educational experience, they are not appropriate indicators of what
students learn in the program or can do at the point of graduation. For example,
a student learning outcome like “Graduates of the XYZ program obtain a job in the
XYZ field or are accepted into a XYZ graduate program” is NOT an appropriate learning
outcome.
Avoiding Multi-Barrel Student Learning Outcomes
- Too Broad: They encompass too much information, often combining two or more separate concepts, skills, or behaviors.
- Difficult to Measure: Because they contain multiple, distinct elements, it is hard for instructors to create a single, valid assessment to measure all of them simultaneously.
- Contain Multiple Verbs: They often use two or more action verbs (e.g., "analyze," "create," "evaluate") applied to different concepts.
- Poor Example: "Students will be able to identify and apply economic theories to real-world scenarios" (This combines recall/recognition with application).
- Poor Example: "Students will write an essay and deliver an oral presentation" (This combines written and oral communication, which are distinct skills).
- Poor Example: "Students will design a website and analyze its traffic" (This combines technical creation with data analysis).
- Assessment Confusion: If a student fails to meet a "double-barrel" outcome, the instructor cannot know if the student failed because they couldn't "identify" or because they couldn't "apply" the concept.
- Ineffective Grading: They often force instructors to give a single grade for two different types of work, reducing the accuracy of assessment data.
- Lack of Clarity: They are less precise, making it harder for students to understand exactly what is expected of them.
- Instead of: "Students will analyze and interpret statistical data"
- Use:
- "Students will analyze statistical data using appropriate measures."
- "Students will interpret statistical data to solve real-world problems."
- [PowerPoint]: Writing GOOD Program Outcomes
- [Article]: A Model of Learning Objectives (Iowa State University)
-
[Handbook]: Developing Program Goals and Student Learning Outcomes (University of Florida)
-
[Web Tool]: ASU's Objective Builder
Some of the links on this page may require additional software to view.